List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Establish systems to monitor progress towards becoming competitive | 1.1 | Determine agreed indicators of progress towards desired future state. |
| 1.2 | Establish contribution to future state indicators by internal and external value stream contributors. |
| 1.3 | Capture information showing progress towards desired future state. |
| 1.4 | Analyse information to determine continued progress towards desired future state. |
| 1.5 | Ensure there are systems which allow monitoring to proceed routinely. |
|
2 | Identify areas of operations practice to improve in consultation with work teams and other employees | 2.1 | Identify work teams, areas and value stream members which could be making better progress towards desired future state. |
| 2.2 | Examine competitive tools being used and their contribution towards progress. |
| 2.3 | Examine other work practices and their contribution towards progress. |
| 2.4 | Manage required stakeholder consultations. |
| 2.5 | Agree on the cause or causes of progress which is not to plan. |
| 2.6 | Determine appropriate competitive tools use to improve progress. |
| 2.7 | Develop an implementation plan. |
|
3 | Facilitate the improvement to operations practice across the organisation | 3.1 | Obtain support and necessary approvals from process/system owners. |
| 3.2 | Arrange for the introduction of new tools or modifications to existing tool practice as required. |
| 3.3 | Arrange for skills and other infrastructure development, as required. |
| 3.4 | Consult with stakeholders, including value stream members, about the impact of these changes. |
| 3.5 | Manage implementation of proposed changes to tools use. |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and include the ability, for one (1) or more workplaces/departments/sections, to:
critically examine existing operations and determine correlations to implementation of competitive systems and practices tools
supervise introduction of new tools or modification of the use of existing tools
integrate tools with the overall operations strategy and future state.
Must provide evidence that demonstrates sufficient knowledge to interact with relevant personnel and be able to audit the use of competitive tools, including knowledge of:
competitive systems and practices at both a strategic and tools level
best practice in implementation of competitive systems and practices tools
customer benefit as used in competitive systems and practices
ways of determining competency gaps that may act as restrictions in achieving best practice in operations
define, measure, analyse, improve and control (DMAIC) process applied to competitive systems and practices tool use
organisation desired future state in both quantitative and qualitative terms
how to measure progress towards desired future state
formal problem solving tools, including root cause analysis (RCA).
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:
a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria
multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.
A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.
Assessment should use a real project where auditing the practice of competitive systems and practices and implementing changes identified through the audit occurs in an operational workplace.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
The assessor must demonstrate both technical competency and currency.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment AND/OR
relevant workplace experience
Currency can be demonstrated through:
performing the competency being assessed as part of current employment OR
having consulted with an organisation providing relevant environmental monitoring, management or technology services about performing the competency being assessed within the last twelve months.